This might cause a lot of work depending on the code you start with. lookups and system filesystem, global selection ), you will want to refactor your application to minimize dependencies and modularize the structure. If you want to adopt the architectural principles in favor of loose coupling that NetBeans RCP promotes beyond ServiceLoader ( e.g. ![]() Using the features that NetBeans APIs supply to provide a consistent looking user interface like progress monitors, wizards, etc. Those problems are hard to understand in the beginning and good information about this part is scarce. Modularization of third party libraries isn't very hard for small projects but it can lead to challenging classloader problems depending on the libraries in use ( especially reflection and custom classloading can cause problems ). The very basic level of adopting the Windows System is easy. Stay in touch: depends on how much of the NetBeans APIs/SPIs and architectural principles you want to integrate. Serverless Persistence for Serverless Java on AWS, December 15th, 2022Īre open for registration. NEW Serverless Event-Driven Architectures with Serverless Java on AWS, December 8th, 2022 and Since JDK 1.6 u7 and u10 Netbeans RCP has a huge advantage- it already exists on every JDK installation - as VisualVM.It is a Netbeans RCP application. On the other hand, Netbeans RCP is perfect for the migration of already existing Swing applications - which are countless as well. OSGI is hyped at the moment - this should be considered choosing between both of the platforms as well. This makes Eclipse especially interesting for development / extension of already existing platforms like SAP, IBM etc. From strategic point of view Eclipse RCP could be more interesting because of countless already existing plugins and extensions. In my opinion SWT / JFace is rather a limitation, than an advantage for a business project. I prefer Swing programming model too - but this is my personal opinion, in both camps developers can become slightly religious about this topic. Swing is mature - actually too mature, it hadn't change for several years :-). In the role of an architect I would always prefer Swing for UI development, because actually there are no limits. SWT is more limited - some even trivial tasks can become interesting (in one project we spent an amazing amount of time to provide a vertical lable for a caption of a table). Swing isn't native, so that you can extend it, change its behavior in unlimited ways. SWT started as an IDE-toolkit, and Swing was designed as application toolkit from the beginning. ![]() Eclipse RCP is based on native SWT / JFace framework, whereby Netbeans is based on Swing. The key difference between both is the UI-Framework. I read several comparisons, attended at JavaONE 2008 sessions, and all comparisons were so far somehow theoretic if not esoteric.īecause both platform have similar feature set and are both really mature (Netbeans RCP is older, whereby Eclipse RCP is more popular), a feature matrix is no more that interesting for choosing the right platform. Both platforms are very comparable Netbeans relies heavily on the ServiceLoader, which is part of JDK 1.6 and Eclipse RCP uses OSGI which is JSR-291 and will become indirectly a standard (via JSR-277). ![]() ![]() Who cares about a slightly better help, or a different configuration of the menu system?. Actually all of the comparisons I know right now are feature by feature comparisons, which are not very interesting for a real world project. During the tour we discussed Eclipse RCP vs. I'm back from Netbeans World Tour from Poland so I'm totally unbiased :-).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |